I found myself in district court last week—it was a trial readiness day, and so the room was abuzz with attorneys trying to broker pleas and argue motions in anticipation of the trials that would be held within the next few days. Generally, the motions were heard without incident. The court allowed countless motions to “exclude the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test,” “sequester the witnesses,” and “keep out the defendant’s breath test refusal” without even an objection from the Commonwealth. Read More
Recent Posts
- Law Review Symposium Goes Virtual February 1, 2021
- Special Immigrant Juvenile Status: Abused Children Seeking State Court Intervention January 29, 2021
- Arun Kumar Judgment—A Gender Spectrum Model of Marriage in India December 26, 2020
- Massachusetts Wages Cupcake Wars During Pandemic December 9, 2020
- An Examination of the Good Moral Character Requirement August 27, 2020