I found myself in district court last week—it was a trial readiness day, and so the room was abuzz with attorneys trying to broker pleas and argue motions in anticipation of the trials that would be held within the next few days. Generally, the motions were heard without incident. The court allowed countless motions to “exclude the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test,” “sequester the witnesses,” and “keep out the defendant’s breath test refusal” without even an objection from the Commonwealth. Read More
Please join the Western New England Law Review in welcoming the incoming Senior Staff to Volume 45! Congratulations to all! ⚖️
Join us TODAY at 10 AM for our Virtual Symposium: Post-Pandemic Digital World: Platforms, Algorithms, Cybersecurity, and Justice. It’s not too late to register at the link in our bio!
Professor Jennifer Taub is a legal scholar and advocate, devoted to making complex business law topics engaging inside and outside of the classroom. Her research and writing focuses on corporate governance, banking and financial market regulation, and white collar crime. Similarly, her advocacy centers on “follow the money” matters—promoting transparency and opposing corruption.
Our Twitter:My Tweets
- What’s Bad for the Goose Is Bad for the Gander: Censorship Is Harmful Whether Done by the Government or Private Industry August 10, 2021
- Gender Bias and Parental Alienation: How Massachusetts Courts Are Perpetuating a Dangerous Mythology March 22, 2021
- Law Review Symposium Goes Virtual February 1, 2021